Friday, 17 July 2026Live global desk
GlobalPulse
The world, tracked in motion
Business

SpaceX aborts Starship test flight, sending stock lower

A technical failure during the countdown of Starship's Flight 13 triggered an automatic abort and sparked volatility in SpaceX's stock.

SpaceX aborts Starship test flight, sending stock lower
SpaceX aborts Starship test flight, sending stock lower

SpaceX Aborts Starship Test Flight, Sending Stock Lower

SpaceX aborted the launch of its latest Starship test flight on Thursday, July 16, 2026, after several engines failed to ignite during the final seconds of the countdown. The failure triggered an automatic launch abort, keeping the 407-foot rocket anchored to the pad at the company's Starbase facility in Cameron County, Texas.

The event occurred just as the Raptor engines in the Super Heavy booster attempted to ignite. While the launch webcast showed ignition three seconds before the planned liftoff, on-screen data indicated that four engines did not fire. This caused the remaining 29 engines to shut down immediately. The company began offloading propellant shortly after the abort.

The scrubbed mission, designated Flight 13, was the first launch attempt since SpaceX became a publicly traded company on June 12. The failure had an immediate impact on investor confidence. Shares, which closed at $131.11 earlier in the day — below the initial public offering price of $135 for the first time — saw further volatility in after-hours trading. Shares were at approximately $132 when the abort happened and plummeted to nearly $125 within five minutes, before rebounding slightly to $127.

Elon Musk, SpaceX CEO, addressed the failure on X, stating, Some of the engines didn't start, triggering an automatic launch abort. To ensure a successful subsequent attempt, Musk noted that two Raptors will be removed and replaced. He indicated that the next launch attempt would likely happen in a few days, with the most probable timing being early next week.

Technical Stakes and the V3 Design

Flight 13 was intended to be the second flight of Version 3 of the spacecraft and Super Heavy booster. This iteration is a clean-sheet design, according to Charlie Cox, director of Starship Engineering, who stated the team took a step back to address reliability and performance problems found in previous versions.

Bill Riley, vice president of Starship Engineering, described Version 3 as the foundational design necessary for future missions, including returning humans to the moon and establishing a city on Mars. The program is critical for NASA, which plans to use a lunar lander version of Starship to put astronauts on the lunar surface. NASA intends to begin testing the lander as early as next year during the Artemis III mission. This is part of a broader effort alongside Blue Origin to have landers ready for the Artemis III crew to practice docking in Earth orbit. A subsequent mission, Artemis IV, planned for no earlier than 2028, would use one of these landers to take two astronauts to the moon's south polar region.

Starlink Integration and Mission Profile

Beyond lunar ambitions, SpaceX is utilizing Starship to expand its Starlink network and develop space-based data centers. Flight 13 carried a significant payload: 20 functioning next-generation Starlink V3 satellites. Unlike previous flights that used mass simulators, these operational satellites were intended to be deployed during a suborbital flight to undergo 20 minutes of testing.

According to Tyler Lionquist of SpaceX, the brief flight was designed to speed run deployment and communications tests, including the activation of solar arrays and antennas. The Starlink V3 satellites are larger and more powerful than previous versions, offering 1 terabit per second of downlink capacity and 160 gigabits per second of uplink capacity. They feature upgraded phased-array and backhaul antennas and solar arrays that generate twice the power of V2 satellites.

The planned trajectory for Flight 13 would have seen the spacecraft travel from Texas over the Gulf and Caribbean, crossing the Atlantic to splash down in the Indian Ocean, while the booster would have splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico.

Context of Previous Failures

The company is still iterating based on Flight 12, which took place on May 22. While that mission was considered successful, the Super Heavy booster suffered propulsion problems during its boostback burn, leading to a hard splashdown in the Gulf. This triggered an FAA mishap investigation, which has since been closed after the agency accepted a SpaceX-led review. Additionally, the Starship spacecraft lost one Raptor engine during Flight 12, which forced the cancellation of an attempt to relight an engine in space, a step necessary for reaching orbit.

Market Pressure

The stock's decline follows a five-day losing streak, closing at $133.32 on Thursday. Analysts suggest the initial euphoria from the Nasdaq debut has faded. the market may face additional pressure in the coming months as restrictions on stock sales for insiders and employees lift. Specifically, 911.5 million shares could be unloaded on the second trading day after the company's first quarterly report, expected in August.

Despite the volatility, some investors remain optimistic. Nancy Tengler of Laffer Tengler Investment described the pullback as an opportunity, noting that Musk frequently teeters on the edge of disaster and pulls back just in time.

Reporting based on coverage by apnews.com.

Related stories