Blake Lively was spotted alone in New York on June 20, 2026, as Taylor Swift hosted a gathering in Rhode Island, marking a shift in their once-closely knit social circle. The moment came amid ongoing legal and personal turbulence for the “Gossip Girl” star, including a $2 million construction trust issue with Ryan Reynolds and a contentious ruling in her defamation case against Justin Baldoni.
Legal Victory with Limits
Judge Lewis Liman’s June 12 ruling in Blake Lively’s defamation case against Justin Baldoni awarded her $400 million in legal fees but denied damages, a decision that underscores the complexity of her 2024 lawsuit. The judge cited California’s Civil Code Section 47.1, which shields accusers from retaliatory defamation suits, but emphasized that Lively’s claims lacked malice. “Lively is entitled to fees and costs,” Liman wrote, though he left room for future damages through independent lawsuits.
Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, criticized the ruling, noting Lively initially sought $300 million in damages. “She had 10 of her 13 claims dismissed, then chose to settle and received nothing,” he said. Lively’s team, however, framed the outcome as a win, highlighting that she “brought her claims in good faith” and “is the prevailing defendant under Section 47.1.” The ruling followed a 14-month legal battle that drew national attention, with legal analysts noting its implications for high-profile harassment lawsuits. California’s Section 47.1, enacted in 2019, has been invoked in cases involving workplace harassment and media disclosures, but its application in celebrity litigation remains contentious.
Experts such as constitutional law professor Laura Murphy of UCLA Law commented that the decision reflects a judicial reluctance to award damages in cases where plaintiffs cannot prove “actual malice,” a standard set by the U.S. Supreme Court in New York Times v. Sullivan (1964). “This ruling could set a precedent for future cases involving public figures,” Murphy said, “but it also highlights the challenges of balancing free speech protections with accountability.”
Construction Controversy and
Find more reporting in our Entertainment section.
